|
>
CRYONICS:
A Basic Introduction
(For the FAQ about Cryonics Institute Membership,
see Becoming a Member: the FAQ.)
Q: What is 'cryonics'?
A:
Cryonics is a technique designed to save lives and greatly extend lifespan.
It involves cooling legally-dead people to liquid nitrogen temperature
where physical decay essentially stops, in the hope that future technologically advanced scientific
procedures will someday be able to revive them and restore them to youth and good health.
A person held in such a state is said to be a "cryopreserved patient", because
we do not regard the cryopreserved person as being really "dead".
(For more detail on this question, see About Cryonics.)
Q:
Can cryonics be performed on living people?
A:
Legally, not yet. Obviously, it would be better to cool a patient before
illness causes so much physical damage that it results in death. But it's
not presently allowed by law, even for someone in great suffering or with
a terminal illness. We hope that one day it will be, under carefully controlled
conditions, once revival from cryopreservation can be demonstrated.
Q:
How do you know revival is even possible?
A:
We believe that revival is a real possibility because:
(1)
Many biological specimens have been cryopreserved, stored at liquid nitrogen temperature
where all decay ceases, and revived; these include whole insects, vinegar
eels, many types of human tissue including brain tissue, human embryos
which have later grown into healthy children, and a few small mammalian
organs. Increasingly more cells, organs and tissues are being reversibly
cryopreserved.
(2)
The repair capabilities of molecular biology and nanotechnology increasingly
point to a future technology that can repair damage due to aging, disease and freezing.
Q:
Has any mammal been cryopreserved and revived?
A: Not to cryogenic
temperatures. Dogs and monkeys have had their blood replaced with protective solution
and cooled to below 0ºC, with subsequent rewarming and revival. Nematode worms
have been cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen (-196ºC), and subsequently revived. At the July 2005
Society for Cryobiology Conference, it was announced that a rabbit kidney had been completely
vitrified to solid state
at -135ºC, rewarmed and transplanted to a rabbit with complete viability. The prospect that
this could be done to a mammalian brain is very good. Although a whole mammal has not yet
been cryopreserved to cryogenic temperatures and revived, the progress of science is moving
in that direction.
However, that is not the reason why people currently practice cryonics.
Cryonics is practiced because of a belief that the damage caused by current cryopreservation
can someday be repaired. Molecular repair technologies like nanotechnology give us hope that
we can be revived from cryopreservation that uses current techniques by future technology that does
not yet exist. If we are causing damage today, we believe there will be means to repair that
damage in the future.
Q:
What is "cryonic suspension"?
A:
The cryonic cryopreservation state is sometimes described as "cryonic suspension",
possibly because the patient is unchanging and therefore "suspended in time" —
although this terminology is misleading and confusing. Cryopreservation is not
"suspended animation" in the sense of being reversible by current technology.
The person is more bouyant, but not really "suspended" in liquid nitrogen because
they are more dense than liquid nitrogen and sink.
Q:
Isn't cryonics just a wild science-fiction gamble?
A:
No. It isn't. Especially in light of the development of a new form
of technology called nanotechnology — the manipulation of individual atoms
or molecules, eventually to build or repair virtually any physical object,
including human cells and biological tissue.
One
of its projected applications is the repair of precisely the sort of damage
to human tissue caused by freezing at liquid nitrogen temperatures - not
to mention cellular and organic damage caused by disease and aging.
When will that happen? Robert A. Freitas, author of three-volume text
Nanomedicine
— selections
from which are available via our Links page — has publicly stated, "I would
not be surprised if the first cryonics revival was attempted by 2040-2050."
Q:
Are there scientific studies on feasibility or lack of
feasibility?
A:
Dr. Ralph Merkle, examining the plausibility of cryonics in his essay
'The Molecular Repair Of The
Brain', observes, "Interestingly (and somewhat to the author's surprise)
there are no published technical articles on cryonics that claim it won't
work...A literature search on cryonics along with personal inquiries has
not produced a single technical paper on the subject that claims that cryonics
is not feasible. On the other hand, technical papers and analyses of cryonics
that speak favorably of its eventual success have been published. It is unreasonable,
given the extant literature, to conclude that cryonics is unlikely to work."
A recent notable technical paper which provides scientific evidence for the
feasibility of cryonics is:
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES; Lemler,J;
1019:559-563 (2004).
Q:
Are there public statements by eminent scientists who recognize that cryonics has
scientific merit?
A:
Yes. See Scientists' Open Letter
on Cryonics in which 60 eminent scientists affirm that "cryonics is a
legitimate science-based endeavor". Note that cryonics is science-based,
but cannot correctly be called current science. Cryonics is a protoscience
based on expectations of the repair capabilities of future science. Although the projection
is less, possible human habitation of Mars is similarly a science-based concept based
on projections of the capabilities of current science.
Q:
But isn't freezing a deceased person pointless? Once you're dead, you're
dead. And even if you could revive them, they'd just have the same fatal
disease they had before.
A:
If by 'dead' you mean 'clinically dead', without heartbeat or breathing,
then 'raising the dead' is done every day, thousands of times every year,
in hospitals all over the world. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation or CPR —
developed in the 1950's — quite commonly restores life to people who were
once considered (wrongly) to be absolutely and irretrievably dead, throughout
all of previous human history. Yet now such a technique is standard practice.
If
we can restore life to people who have been dead for several minutes, and
even hours in some drowning cases, why should we assume that doing the same
after years is impossible, if we can prevent further deterioration during
that time?
'Absolute'
death may only be said to occur when the brain's essential information is
destroyed - and brain preservation is precisely what cryopreservation aims
to achieve.
As
for having a fatal disease — as science progresses, fatal diseases
become formerly fatal diseases. Polio or bubonic plague was fatal once; they
- and hundreds of other diseases — are not fatal now. Many qualified people
think that cures for currently fatal diseases - including old age - are only
a matter of time.
Q:
Do you really think it will become possible to cure every disease,
even reverse the effects of aging, and repair all freezing damage as well
—?
A:
It isn't necessary to wait till 'every' disease imaginable is cured, all
at one stroke. What you really need to do to make cryonics itself work is
to cure or prevent freezing damage. And as previously indicated, there is
reason to think nanotechnology will be capable of cure or repair, while reduction
of damage has already been achieved, and our research is ongoing.
As
improved freezing methods, or improved methods of "vitrification" are developed,
there will be less burden on future technology, hence probably earlier revival.
Vitrification
means formation of a glasslike solid as temperature falls. This stops the formation of
ice crystals that may damage tissues, eliminating freezing damage altogether. The
Cryonics Institute vitrified its first human patient in the Summer of 2005
(see The
Cryonics Institute's 69th Patient).
Q:
But aren't you really talking about raising the dead!
A:
No. Cryonics is a matter of rational procedure, not religious miracle. Cryonics
can't restore life to people whose brains have been long been physically
destroyed - a Lincoln, or a Julius Caesar, or those cremated. Cryonics
simply — but reasonably — claims that if you cryopreserve a person in a way that
limits damage, then that person's brain structure may be preserved sufficiently
to make it at least possible the eventual recovery of life and
health.
And
let's not be confused by language. "Dead" people — apparently dead people,
no heartbeat or respiration — are revived every year, in hospitals all over
the world, by the thousands. The dictionary definition of "death" is
permanent cessation of vital functions. Therefore, if someone is
recovered, that means the person wasn't "really" dead in the first place, and we
think that's the best way to look at it.
Q:
Can you guarantee success?
A:
Sadly, we can't. No one can guarantee success, because no one can guarantee
the future. No one can predict scientific progress with certainty, but we
believe a strong case can be made for the probable success of cryonics. But
that doesn't mean that social disruptions aren't possible. Nuclear war, economic
collapse, political strife, terrorism, are all possible, and they could end
the lives of cryopreserved patients just as easily as they can end the
lives of those outside it.
Q:
Can you guarantee the safety of patients?
The
oldest patient currently still being held in cryopreservation is a Dr.
James Bedford, who was suspended in 1967. He's survived the Cold War, the Vietnam War,
the Gulf War, Watergate, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the 9/11 attacks - which
is more than many of his
contemporaries can say. If he can make it for so many years, you can too. After
all, the world is (relatively) stable at the moment, global world war doesn't
seem likely, and the economy is still growing.
Again,
we can't guarantee the future. But we can and do guarantee this: that at
CI we'll give our very best efforts to see our member patients are restored
to life and good health. Because the life of every director and officer and
member of CI depends on those efforts too.
Q:
What about the cost? I heard cryonics is supposed to be incredibly
expensive.
A:
Good news: you heard wrong! With CI, the minimum fee for cryopreservation
at CI (which includes vitrification perfusion and long term storage) is $28,000
— a one-time fee, due at time of death. And though it can
be paid in cash, usually a member has a life insurance policy made that pays
the amount to CI upon death. To have all this and also to have
a cryonics team wait by the bedside ("Standby") to perform rapid cooling and
cardiopulmonary support upon pronouncement of death can sometimes be paid
for by a larger life insurance policy. But many CI Members simply take the
$28,000 option, without Standby, which can cost around $30 a month
for someone starting his insurance when middle aged and in good health.
Insurance agents with knowledge of life insurance policies for cryonics purposes
can be found under the Insurance Agents section
of a page on this website. In some places in
the U.S. a middle-aged man in good health can get a $100,000 "permanent life insurance policy"
for about $600 a year. Which means that, far from being expensive, cryonics membership,
standby from a cryonics organization, and cryopreservation can cost you no more than fifty dollars
a month, if that - less than many usual activities such as eating out or holidays.
Advice from an insurance professional is recommended before selecting a policy. Because of possible future
price increases — or additional future services requiring additional payments — it is
prudent to buy more insurance than the absolute minimum required, at least $200,000.
If you need to save money, you can make your arrangements without professional standby,
and insure for $50,000, costing
about $360/year or $30/month. The funeral service industry is competant to perform cryonic
preparations, and can sometimes do standby (without the equipment of cryonics professionals).
This can reduce the quality of the cryopreservation.
A
person who wishes to become a Lifetime CI Member can make a single membership
payment of $1,250 and doesn't have to pay any annual dues at all after that.
If
a new member would rather pay a smaller amount up front, in exchange for
funding a slightly higher cryopreservation fee later on ($35,000), he or she can join
with a $75 initiation fee, and pay annual dues of only $120,
which are also payable in quarterly installments of $35. (And such a dues-paying
member can upgrade to Lifetime Membership at any time, saving $7,000
and any dues ever again.) True, members at a distance may have to pay local funeral
director fees and transportation costs to Michigan to be cryopreserved, but these payments
are not made to CI.
Take
a look at our Becoming A Member FAQ and
the membership application forms
to find out more. And if you've got any questions, or want to talk about
making special arrangements? Give us a call at (586) 791-5961 or drop us an
email at CIHQ@aol.com. We're more
than happy to help.
Q:
How much do the other organizations charge?
A:
Prices vary greatly. CI has by far the lowest costs of any cryonics
organization. Our procedures are very cost-conscious but they are based on experiment and
professional evaluation, and in our judgment likely to give our patients
the best overall chance of recovery.
We think a prospective member should shop around, and our web
site has links to all the other providers' sites, so see for yourself. Prices
with other organizations can be as much as $160,000 or more for whole
body cryopreservation and $80,000 for the "neuro" (head-only) option, which CI
doesn't offer.
Take a look at our article,
Comparing Prices and Policies, to find out
more.
Q:
What if I can't get life insurance?
A:
If you have — or expect to have — sufficient assets in any form, we may be
able to work something out. Our members include attorneys and estate planners
who are no strangers to creative financing.
Q:
What's the "neuro" option? And why don't you offer it?
A:
"Neuro" is short for neurocryopreservation, and it refers to the practice of removing
and cryopreserving only the head of a person declared legally dead. The theory
is that only the information contained in the brain is of any importance,
and that a body to contain the revived brain could be easily cloned or
regenerated at some point in the future.
Neurocryopreservation
requires less space and maintenance, and so saves money. But our price for
whole-body is already lower than that of others for 'neuro', so cost is less
important. We do not offer the neuro option at present, largely because we
are concerned about neuro's negative effect on public relations
and, especially, on the families of patients.
Journalists
and horror novelists invariably have a field day with 'frozen severed heads',
and focus not on the scientific or humanitarian sense of cryonics,
but on making cryonics look grotesque or ridiculous.
Why
ask for such trouble - trouble that can put a patient at risk?
[
Questions continued:
CRYONICS: A Basic Introduction (Continued)]
|