First,
although term insurance is cheapest, it must be renewed periodically at higher
prices and it may become unaffordable when you become elderly. However, there
are term-to-100 policies and similar types of term insurance that have fixed
rates (rates never increase) for the whole life of the policy.
But term insurance
-- which has no investment component -- may still be the most appropriate
way of funding a contract if you also have a savings or investment program
which down the road will suffice to fund your cryopreservation as well as your
retirement.
Other
types of insurance, such as "whole life" and "universal life"
have an investment component. Whether the "investment" is worth while
depends on many factors which you alone -- or your advisers--can evaluate.
A danger with whole life policies is that someone can sue for the cash
value of the policy.
A
very rare problem is that the company may not want to recognize CI as being
an acceptable beneficiary. We have not encountered that for quite a long
time, but if it should happen you would need another company.
We
have a list of insurance agents with experience drawing up cryopreservation
agreements, and as its length indicates, getting a policy from a reputable
organization is generally no problem at all.
Q:
If I am not "really" dead, will the life insurance company still pay off?
If I'm eventually revived, will the life insurance company demand its money
back?
A:
Don't worry. Insurance companies pay off on receiving a death certificate
-- they aren't concerned with what happens to you after that. The actuarial
statistics are not affected, and the company suffers no unusual loss.
Actually,
insurance companies benefit from cryonics. A member still needs the usual
insurance to protect his family, and additional insurance to fund the cryonics
contract. Once cryonics becomes commonplace, life insurance companies will
benefit handsomely.
Q:
Suppose my wife and I are elderly and cannot buy life insurance. Our home
is worth more than enough to pay the CI cryopreservation fee for both of us, but
we need to keep it and reside in it while we live. Can anything be
done?
A:
Maybe. CI generally cannot afford to take financial risks or accept delays
in payment for cryopreservation. At the same time, we understand that financial
circumstances for some may be difficult and we try very hard to accommodate
the needs of people. We will be as flexible as prudence allows. Depending
on individual circumstances, for instance, a somewhat larger than usual
suspension fee might justify a greater than usual delay in payment.
Our
officers will investigate special cases, and our directors will make the
decision. Talk to us about it. By all means let's get together. We may be
able to work something out. But there must be an agreement in hand,
signed by both parties, before we can accept any patient.
Q:
Is life insurance the best way to fund a contract?
A:
Not necessarily. John de Rivaz is a long-time British member of the Cryonics
Institute. Below are his suggestions for funding a CI contract (and perhaps
also providing for your retirement) through an investment trust, or a combination
of term life insurance and investment trust.
Incidentally,
Mr. de Rivaz himself been very successful so far in applying his strategy;
but of course neither he nor we are professional investment advisors , and
the following is offered only as one man's opinion, not our official
recommendation. (We have not changed the British language usage.)
"The
cheapest way to sign up for cryonics suspension is to have a portfolio of
equity investments in a revocable trust. These investments will grow and
work for you as well as supply your suspension funding. Life insurance has
to be paid for, which means your investments are much less efficient. Your
money is used to pay the high fees of financial professionals instead of
working for you.
"If
people are to be revived from cryopreservation, then there will have to be
advances in technology that are not currently allowed for by stock market
quotations. Therefore I expect that funds invested in technology will grow
well beyond the expectations of professional financial advisors.
"If
people are not revived for reasons of lack of technology, then they will
not be there to observe this, which means it will not happen as far as they
are concerned. Therefore your portfolio of investments should be in good
quality companies in a cryonics trust. The Cryonics Institute already have
a trust form that you can use.
"If
you have little money at present, some cryonics organisations will probably
try to persuade you to take out whole life insurance. I consider this will
not give you the best possible financial performance. Instead I would recommend,
in order of financial efficiency:
"1.
If you wish to take the risk of dying young in an accident yourself, save
money vigorously by investing in a technology unit trust until you have amassed
enough to join the Cryonics Institute with a trust ready.
"2.
Take out term life insurance for say ten years (very cheap if you are young),
join the Cryonics Institute, and also save vigorously until you have enough
for a trust.
"Investing
in technology stocks should give, over a long term period, a good
annual growth. Therefore the more you can invest early, the less
you need to invest later. If you have very little now, ask a financial advisor
for a technology based unit trust (such as Prolific Technology) or investment
trust company into which you can make monthly payments. But avoid investing at
the top of a "spike" such as March 2000, when the US tax gathering season
caused a mass sell-off following millenium euphoria.
"Do
not be persuaded to buy insurance bonds to save tax - if you have little
money you pay no capital gains tax anyway. It is capital gains that will
drive a technology fund up - the income is trivial or non-existent.
"A
PEP may be advantageous only if it is a "no charges" PEP - some unit trusts
run these to encourage people to invest in their units. I do not know if
a technology one exists, - I would rather doubt it. Also the best technology
unit trusts have some investments outside Europe so they do not qualify for
PEPs. If you have little money the advantages of a PEP do not outweigh the
advantages of a global spread of investments.
"PEP
is Personal Equity Plan, an artificial construct of UK government which enables
securities within it to be free of penalties on gains or income. However
it has to be managed by a bank or other professional who makes a charge,
even though the owner can select investments. Roughly the charge balances
out the income tax recovered, but the freedom to trade without penalty on
realising holdings for re-investment makes it worthwhile.
"It
is shortly to be replaced by something similar called ISA. Individual Savings
Account. The main difference is that there is a limit as to what can be
introduced to an ISA. I think you have something like this called IRA, but
there may be restrictions on withdrawal that are not present with
PEP/ISA.
"Do
not worry about stock market "shakeouts" and "slumps" - they happen from
time to time, but over a decade or so you will find that your fund will grow
dramatically. Making monthly payments means that you get more units when
the market is down.
"Our
civilisation is totally dependent on technology, and technologcial growth
at that. If our civilisation survives, your funds will grow. If it does not,
money will have no meaning anyway.
"Cryonics
need not cost you very much beyond ordinary investment practise. If you are
young and start these practises now, and if something better than cryonics
comes along, you will still be able to afford it. Indeed, if you decide that
cryonics is not for you, then you will still have the funds for other purposes.
The revocable trust means that you retain full ownership and control while
alive.
"If
you save regularly and can achieve a good long term annual return with technology
equities or funds, your investment will be spectacularly better than with
any kind of life insurance."
-
John de Rivaz
Does
all of the above sound a bit much? Well, nobody said becoming immortal would
be simple. But after all: it maybe simpler than buying or selling a house,
and you usually do that several times during your lifetime. Plus, we have
experienced and sympathetic people who've been through it before and will
be more than happy to guide you through it.
Q: Which is the safest method of funding a cryopreservation?
A: Nothing in the world is perfectly safe.
Governments around the world strive to make everything
perfectly safe. However this may well be an impossible
task, and attempts often add to problems.
The various methods of funding a cryopreservation all
have their strengths and weaknesses.
The risks of your affairs being managed by a Receiver.
One of the big problems with elderly people is that as
they near death they are often not competent to handle
their own affairs and a Receiver can be appointed. Also
as death approaches confusion can increase in the management
of their affairs whoever is in control.
A living will can at least enable the patient to say who that
Receiver will be in the instance of incompetence.
Also, as people live their lives there is always the risk of
some adventurer finding some slip that they have made during
their lives (examples include: a mishandled divorce, sale of
a lease, a guarantee that they thought was safe being called,
or a mistake in capital taxation being uncovered by a tax
audit) which renders their assets forfeit. It is often compound
interest from an event many years ago, and professional charges,
which amplify the cost beyond the victim's means. With the
increase of computer data systems, companies have emerged to
make profits from these situations by searching past transactions
on official files for such mistakes. Victims of this can find that
a receiver in bankruptcy can be appointed. He is going to have
no sympathy for cryonics. It is his duty to the creditors to
collect as much money as possible. Of course he gets a very
substantial fee for so doing. This and any associated transaction
taxes are taken from the victim's assets before the residue is
handed to the creditor.
The only way of avoiding running the risk of not being cryopreserved
as a result of the actions of a Receiver is to fund your
cryopreservation in some irrevocable manner. That is to say
you can't change your mind later.
Life Insurance
Life insurance is the most popular method of funding cryonics,
and one of its important strengths is that a properly written
policy is usually safe from a Receiver. Insurance policies with
cash values can become the target of a lawsuit by a spouse. Term
policies become prohibitively expensive with advancing age.
Term-to-100 policies avoid both these problems, but are becoming
increasingly difficult to obtain (one agent tells us they are now
impossible to obtain). These policies have no cash value but pay
out if the assured dies before reaching 100, or pay out if he/she reaches 100.
They should be set up so that if the patient reaches 100 then CI gets the
money. Bear in mind that the average lifespan is increasing and it is quite
likely that some middle aged or younger cryonicists will reach 100. The fact
that these policies have no cash value makes them immune to lawsuits, but of
course if you are litgated you may not be able to afford keeping the
premiums paid. (Most state laws protect life insurance policies
from creditors, but make exception for a spouse. If lawsuit by a
spouse is not a worry then lawsuits should not be a concern.)
Cash value does have the advantage of providing a buffer against
temporary periods when the insured is not able to pay premiums.
In order to provide the pay out, many types of life insurance
have to have the premiums paid right up to the point of death. If
one is missed, then the policy becomes valueless. Obviously once
someone is under a receiver, life premiums may stop being paid.
There are premium protection plans, but these are subject to
specific situations and a patient could easy find that he has
not met them all. There are policies which can become "paid up"
and have some value even if no more premiums are paid. But this
usually needs to be negotiated, not just initiated by the premium
flow ceasing. Also such policies are usually more expensive.
Single payment "investment only" policies can be found, but they
are few and far between. With one of these, there needs to be no
medical evidence and no questions are asked. There are no periodic
payments to be made. Therefore the chances of the company not
paying because of a technicality are vanishingly small. But to
get $X cover you need to provide $X. However this will be very
safe unless legislation changes the immunity offered to life
policies. In addition, your policy for $X will usually pay out
more than $X because there are investment bonuses declared
every year. (Hence the term "Investment Only") These bonuses
could be useful for funding transport costs which rise each
year well above average inflation. These policies are often
used by elderly people to avoid death taxes, or to provide
ready cash to pay death taxes on non-realisable assets such
as a home that has been in the family for many generations.
Again, governments may legislate against them if they feel
that they are distorting the tax system or preventing
re-distribution of real estate to an excessive degree.
Some people worry that as governments get more
concerned about the funding of the care of an ageing
population, legislation may well be enacted to removed this
security. (ie they won't want people protecting their assets
for the next generation at the expense of the state paying for
their terminal care.) Also, once the proceeds of a policy have
been made irrevocable, the insured has lost control of his money,
which many people do not like.
We advise that all members make CI the owner of the policy - this
strengthens the position of there is a dispute or litigation with Receivers
or other third parties.
Revocable Trusts
The Cryonics Institute has a standardized revocable trust
form which members can use, but there is no guarantee that
it will be legal in every state or jurisdiction. If you make
your own trust (or pay to have an individualised one made)
this can lead to problems in funding if lawyers disagree
over what it means. Even if a trust is deemed valid, CI
must verify that adequate funding is in place behind the
trust. Either problem could delay your cryopreservation,
and for this reason there are those who dislike this method
of funding.
Trusts are investment efficient, but as their name says they
are revocable and therefore subject to the aforementioned
risks. Also investments can go down as well as up. A young
person can start one of these and after a while pay so much
a year into a prepayment fund with CI. If planned carefully
using annual tax allowances, this can be done without paying
gains taxes and still leave substantial sums of money in the
investment pot. The owner of the investments is usually the
trustee, therefore there are no additional charges and fees.
The assets are taxed as part of the owner's assets. There are
no additional taxes of any sort, although if there was a large
additional estate not being bequeathed to the Cryonics Institute
it may be depleted slightly by having to pay death taxes on
the value of the trust.
Transfer on Death Accounts
People who want to receive the income and investment gains
from their funds can have a "Transfer on Death" (TOD), also known
as "Pay on Death" account which in most states can avoid the
delays, uncertainties and possible injustices of probate.
However, these transfer on death accounts would not be immune
from the attentions of a Receiver and if CI must verify that
adequate funding is in the TOD account there could be delays.
If a TOD account is established with an investment agent or
broker with which CI has an established relationship and
adequate funding is in the account, there would be no delays.
Prepayment
The Cryonics Institute will accept prepayment for a cryopreservation.
It is easy to get credit these days, and a member without the cash
to hand could borrow the money, make a prepayment and the pay off
the loan using periodic payments as an alternative to life
insurance if he isn't insurable. If he dies before finishing
the loan, it becomes a debit on his estate and does not affect
the payment to CI unless the estate is bankrupt. In the latter
case a Receiver may be able to get the money back from CI. In
cases where there are other beneficiaries and the estate is large
enough to be subject to death taxes, there are a few situations
where the debit on the estate can actually increase the payments
they get.
An alternative method for elderly people with more than the bare
minimum for a cryopreservation is to split their funds between a
prepayment and buying themselves an annuity. This is a reverse
life insurance policy where the policyholder gives the life company
a capital sum. The life company pays out a periodic income until
the policyholder dies, and then it keeps the capital. The older
you are when proposing the policy, the greater the income you
can get. Unlike life insurance, the sicker you are the more
money you get. The enhanced income from the annuity replaces
the lost income on the sum prepaid.
[To prevent anyone asking: The cost of meeting the financial
regulations would be excessive in proportion to the volume of
business CI would get if it offered annuities or life insurance
itself. The definition of "Life Insurance" in law is very broad
and would encompass any possible scheme that people can think up.]
Prepayment to a third party
An alternative would be irrevocable prepayment to a third party,
such as a trust organised by an attorney or another life extension
type organisation. This organisation would have to be trusted to
hand the funds over to CI when the person needs cryopreservation.
It is not possible for CI to offer an irrevocable prepayment plan
itself.
This has disadvantages in that the third party may charge substantial
fees, and the client is taking on the risk of the financial stability
of the third party. However assuming that these problems are not thought
serious, then it would be totally safe from a Receiver. It also has
the disadvantage that the member is totally cut off from their money,
as with other methods that are safe from Receivers.
A further disadvantage is that CI has no preferred list of acceptable
third parties with whom it has already negotiated, and does not
recommend attorneys as they are unlikely to pay out without lots
of prevarication whilst they make absolutely sure that they are
safe so to do. For this reason this method is only really
recommended to people who have funded by another method and
want, and can afford, a backup.
Conclusion
Nothing is perfectly safe, but as CI offers many funding
options each prospective member can chose what suits his own
circumstances best. If you have a lot of money, and plan to
overfund your cryopreservation, it may be best to arrange it by
two or more quite different methods. Do not be put off because
of possible risks - in reality CI has rarely experienced
situations where any of these potential situations have
prevented funding.
Give
us a call, or send an email. Getting properly funded may be easier than you
think.
To
browse all of the Cryonics Institute contracts, go to the
Cryonics Institute Paperwork section of the
Cryonics Institute Website Site Contents page.
(return to top)